Blog Thinkers vs. Blinkers: A Tale of Two Steves Share Apple didn’t just give us some of the world’s most iconic products. It also brought us two of the most famous Steves in business—Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. But while their names will forever be linked, their approaches to decision-making couldn’t have been more different. Take Steve Jobs. Known for his bold, instinctual decision-making, Jobs had a knack for knowing what people wanted before they knew themselves. Consider the iPhone. Jobs didn’t wait for focus groups or market research. He trusted his gut instinct that the world was ready for his product idea and dove in head first. As we know, he was right. Jobs’ decision was fast, visionary, and, most importantly, instinctual—a move driven by intuition and speed. Now contrast that with Steve Wozniak, Apple’s technical architect, who couldn’t be more different from Jobs. Wozniak meticulously designed, researched, and refined every inch of the Apple I and Apple II. He worked through problems systematically, ensuring that every detail was perfect before proceeding. Where Jobs was impulsive, Wozniak was methodical. He thrived on preparation, precision, and deep technical understanding, working quietly behind the scenes to engineer some of Apple’s earliest successes. These two leaders took wildly different approaches to decision-making. They were also both wildly successful. Zooming out, Jobs’ instinct-driven style and Wozniak’s methodical approach are prime examples of two distinct thought systems: thinkers and blinkers. Think vs. Blink So, what’s a thinker, and what’s a blinker? The concept is derived from Daniel Kahneman’s book Thinking, Fast and Slow, which explains decision-making in terms of two systems: System 1, which is fast and instinctual, and System 2, which is slow and deliberate. Through our work with top leaders, we’ve found that renaming these thought systems into more relatable categories—thinkers and blinkers—helps bring the distinction to life. Thinkers rely on data and analysis. They need time to process information, evaluate details, and carefully approach problems. They thrive on structure and preparation and excel in environments where accuracy and planning are critical. Blinkers make decisions quickly, often based on intuition. Blinkers don’t wait for all the facts before acting; they prefer to jump in and figure things out on the fly. They thrive in fast-paced, high-pressure environments where instinct and adaptability take precedence over meticulous planning. There’s no value judgment on which approach is better (though I’m sure many of our readers may prefer working with one over the other). The important thing is to understand what kind of person you’re working with–or for–so you can manage performance towards the best possible outcome. Which One Are You? Many of you probably have a pretty good idea of which camp you fall into. But if you’re still scratching her head, ask yourself a few questions: Do you need all the facts before making a decision, or do you act on instinct? How do you perform under pressure—do you pause and consider, or react quickly and confidently? Do you thrive on detailed plans, or do you prefer improvisation and flexibility? Those who fall on the instinctive, reactionary, and improvisational side of the spectrum are most likely blinkers. Meanwhile, those who prefer to assess, analyze, and structure their decisions carefully are likely thinkers. Again, one isn’t necessarily better than the other, but understanding these key traits can help you understand who you’re working with and, more importantly, how to work with them effectively. Working with Thinkers and Blinkers Whether you’re a thinker or a blinker, we all need to be able to work with both types. Think back to some high-friction moments throughout your career. Are you a blinker who used to corner your boss in the hallway for off-the-cuff conversations about high-stakes issues only to get the cold shoulder? That interaction might make a little more sense if you consider that your boss may have been a thinker. Did you spend hours putting together data only to have your CEO make a snap judgment after barely glancing at the information you shared? In retrospect, your CEO may have been a blinker. While these two personality types have clear differences, that doesn’t mean they can’t work together effectively. The key is to understand both yourself and the person you’re working with (whether it’s a direct report, co-worker or manager). Let’s walk through a few quick tips on how you can manage these different thought systems: How to Work with Thinkers Provide time for preparation: Thinkers excel when they have time to process information. Send pre-reads and relevant data ahead of time to give them space to analyze and reflect. Avoid surprises: Spontaneity isn’t a thinker’s strength. Schedule meetings and discussions in advance, with clear agendas, so they know what to expect. Be detailed and thorough: Thinkers appreciate clarity. Ensure that your proposals or ideas are well-thought-out and supported by data, as they’ll want to assess every angle before moving forward. How to Work with Blinkers Be concise: Blinkers don’t need long explanations or exhaustive data. Provide high-level summaries and focus on the big picture to keep things moving. Let them move fast: Blinkers excel when given the freedom to act quickly. Allow them to brainstorm and make decisions in real-time, but check in regularly to ensure they’re aligned with long-term objectives. Ground them in data: Blinkers may overlook important details in their rush to act. Surround them with a team that can provide the necessary data and context without slowing down the momentum. Whether you’re a thinker or a blinker—or leading teams that include both—knowing how to leverage these decision-making styles is key to success. Understanding and adapting to these approaches will allow you to foster better communication and collaboration and, ultimately, drive stronger outcomes for you and your team. TMG Thinkers vs. Blinkers: A Tale of Two Steves TMG From Founder Mode to Micro-Leadership: Redefining Hands-On Management